RealSignal · Methodology
How we read a listing.
RealSignal annotates each listing with signals derived from public-record transactions and the listing’s own observed price behaviour. This page explains how each signal is computed and — just as important — what it does not claim.
The sold-result audit
When a listing closes, the sold-result audit reconstructs how the sale actually executed — against its final asking price and against the time it spent on market. It appears on every listing once we confirm a close.
Where the numbers come from
A property’s sold price and sold date become public record once it closes. We confirm the close against the public realtor.ca record and read the realized price, the close date, and — where published — the brokerage and prior sales. Nothing here is modelled or estimated; the audit reports the transaction as it settled.
What we measure
- Vs list at sale — the sold price minus the final list price, in dollars and percent. A negative figure means the property sold under ask (the seller conceded); a positive figure means it sold over ask (buyers competed).
- Days on market at sale — calendar days from the list date to the close date. We count against the final listing; a re-listed property starts a fresh clock (see the silent-collapse note below).
- Price per square foot at sale — the sold price divided by living area, for cohort comparison against same-area, same-type sales.
How to read it
A sale well under ask after only a few days usually points to an aggressive list price meeting a buyer who knew it; a sale over ask points to genuine competition or a deliberately conservative list. The audit pairs the headline figure with cohort context — DOM and price-per-foot percentiles for the same area and property type — so a single number is never read in isolation.
One timing caveat
Occasionally an audit shows the close date and days-on-market before the sold price. The numeric price is drawn from public records shortly after a sale settles and is filled on a later pass — so a date without a price is a brief, transient state, not a missing figure.
The sold-result audit is not an appraisal or an automated valuation. It is the record of one realized transaction, read against its own asking price and its cohort.
The silent-collapse candidate
A silent-collapse candidate is a live listing whose price held flat for an extended stretch and then dropped — the earliest public sign that a deal fell through or a stale listing is re-entering negotiation.
Why the pattern matters
When a deal collapses or a listing expires, that outcome is not always reflected promptly in board status, so the conventional signals — a withdrawn flag, a sold record — can lag. A price that sat unchanged and then cut, by contrast, is visible immediately — which is why the flat-then-drop shape is often the first thing a buyer can act on.
How a listing is flagged
We track each listing’s price daily. A listing becomes a candidate when its price holds flat across an extended window — on the order of two weeks or more — and is then reduced. We flag the pattern; the exact cut amounts and dates appear in the price-history chart on the listing, available to members.
It is a candidate, not a verdict. A flat-then-cut listing may simply be a seller recalibrating to the market. The signal says “look here first,” and the price history tells you the rest of the story.
Signals cover Greater Vancouver listings. Sold confirmations and price moves are refreshed daily. Questions about a specific listing? Read the monthly research for the market context behind the signals.